It's evening. Dinner is ready, the others are at the table. This one child, again, is lingering in the hallway, a book in hand, deaf to what you've said three times already. You feel the heat rising at the back of your neck before you've even understood why.
With the others, you would have smiled. You would have said come eat a fourth time, calmly. With this one child, your voice tightens, your jaw clenches, and something comes out of you that you didn't decide.
And later, when everything is quiet, you pick up your phone. You type the question you don't dare ask anyone. Why always him. Why always her.
Thousands of parents type this question every night. It doesn't make you a bad mother. It makes you a lucid one — one who has noticed something most prefer to keep silent.
There are three possible reasons why this anger keeps landing on the same child. They can overlap. None of them is a flaw in your love.
First hypothesis: the mirror child
This child looks like you. Not in features — in something buried deeper. A slowness you fought your whole life to outgrow. A sensitivity you learned to hide. A quiet defiance you had to give up to survive your own childhood.
When you see that part of yourself in him, in her, it's not the child who is making you angry. It's what you forbade yourself to be. You don't know this in the moment you shout. You feel it only after, in that dizzy shame that follows — because deep down, you were shouting at yourself.
Second hypothesis: the boundary child
This child tests. Not because he is "difficult". Because he has the temperament that, within a family, takes on the function of testing what holds. He pushes, he negotiates, he comes back to it, he doesn't let go. The others yield faster, or deflect, or comply.
With this one, your authority is tested every day. And authority that must constantly be defended is authority that wears down. It's not that this child is too much for your family. It's that your reserves of energy, with him, always run out first.
Third hypothesis: the child who arrived at the wrong moment in your own story
There is the child carried during a bereavement. The child born during a breakup. The child whose arrival coincided with a loss of bearings, a move far from everything, a quiet collapse. The child you couldn't give what you had wanted to — not through lack of love, but because you had nothing left for yourself either.
This child did nothing. You did nothing either. It was the moment that was harsh. And without anyone choosing it, he carries a trace of it, and so do you.
What this does not mean
None of this means you love this child less than the others. None of this means you are a bad mother. None of this means you should feel more guilt.
It means that the anger that keeps landing on the same child is almost never aimed at him. It passes through him because he happens to be, for reasons that belong to you, in the path of an older emotion.
This diagnosis doesn't solve anything on its own. But it changes the question. You no longer ask "why is he like this?" You ask "what, in me, has no way out and comes out on him?"
That's where the work begins. Not in analysis — in daily gesture. In the way you can, next time, transform what's rising before it finds its familiar face.
You are a mother who has noticed. That's already a lot. Most don't dare.
You matter eternally, unconditionally. You are the extraordinary one.
IMPERFECT, WHOLE.
Autres articles du dossier
Articles recommandés
À lire dans le prolongement de cet article.
Glissez ou utilisez les flèches pour parcourir les articles.
Explorer la rubrique : Famille →
Cet article dans d'autres langues
Questions fréquentes
Is it serious that I get angrier with one child than with the others?
It's not serious in a moral sense. It's a signal. It tells you that something is at play in that relationship that isn't at play in the others — often a resonance with your own history, more than a flaw in the child or in your love.
Can my child feel that I get angrier at him?
Yes. Children sense parental asymmetries very finely, even when they are never spoken. That's not a reason to add to your guilt — it's a reason not to leave the question unanswered.
Does it mean I love the others more?
No. Anger and preference don't follow the same logic. You can deeply love a child and be more reactive with him — because proximity, resemblance, or the moment of his arrival make that relationship more charged.
Should I talk about it with this child?
Not in a way that would make him carry your part. You can, in a calm moment, tell him it's not his fault, without explaining the deeper reasons. A child needs to be freed from the weight, not brought into the confidence.
How do I stop this anger that always aims at the same child?
Not by repressing it. By learning to transform it before it reaches him. It's work that passes through the body, through gesture, through what you do with the weight in the minutes before it overflows — not through willpower alone.
Aller plus loin
Découvrez la collection d'ebooks
Six ebooks pour cuisiner avec amour, transmettre, et retrouver le plaisir de la table.


